Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6720 (PNJ)

MUNI RAM ALIAS NEERAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

RFA/1111/2024 · 2026-01-21

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

173 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA MUNI RAM @NEERAJ KUMAR STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Kulvir Nar Mr. Abhinash Jain, Deputy Advocate General, Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate with Ms. Surbhi Rana, Advocate for respondents HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) CM-4345-CI-2025 By way of present application filed under Section 151 CPC, prayer has been made for preponing Notice of the application. Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents-State and Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondents made in the application. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the application, sufficient cause is made out for preponing the date of hearing of the main case and the present application The main case is taken up on board today itself. MAIN CASE For orders, see judgment of even date passed in 2024, titled “Smt. Raj Dulari Versus State of Haryana and others”. Pending application(s), if any, shall also sta January 21, 2026 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH MUNI RAM @NEERAJ KUMAR Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Kulvir Narwal, Advocate for the appellant Mr. Abhinash Jain, Deputy Advocate General, Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate with Ms. Surbhi Rana, Advocate for respondents-HSIIDC. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) 2025 By way of present application filed under Section 151 CPC, prayer has been made for preponing the date of hearing of the main case. Notice of the application. Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of State and Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondents-HSIIDC and do not raise any made in the application. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the application, sufficient cause is made out for preponing the date of hearing of the main case and the present application The main case is taken up on board today itself. For orders, see judgment of even date passed in “Smt. Raj Dulari Versus State of Haryana and others”. Pending application(s), if any, shall also sta January 21, 2026 ( HARKESH MANUJA ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No. 1111 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.01.2026 …..Appellant ...Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA wal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Abhinash Jain, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate with By way of present application filed under Section 151 CPC, prayer the date of hearing of the main case. Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of State and Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate accepts notice on HSIIDC and do not raise any objection to the prayer Having heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the application, sufficient cause is made out for preponing the date of hearing of the main case and the present application is thus, allowed. The main case is taken up on board today itself. For orders, see judgment of even date passed in RFA No. 963 of “Smt. Raj Dulari Versus State of Haryana and others”. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( HARKESH MANUJA ) JUDGE of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.01.2026 By way of present application filed under Section 151 CPC, prayer Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of State and Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate accepts notice on objection to the prayer Having heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the application, sufficient cause is made out for preponing the is thus, allowed. RFA No. 963 of TEJWINDER SINGH 2026.02.04 09:34 I agree to specified portions of this document