Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6720 (BOM)

SACHIN VASANT KALE AND OTHERS v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

WP/1048/2025 · 2025-07-16

Shri Manish Pitale, Shri Y G Khobragade

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

906-WP-1048-2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 906 WRIT PETITION NO. 1048 OF 2025 SACHIN VASANT KALE AND OTHERS VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS .… Mr. Sayyed Tauseef Yaseen, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. V. M. Kagne, AGP for Respondent No.1 – State .… CORAM : MANISH PITALE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ. DATE : 16.07.2025 PER COURT :- 1. Although this Petition is listed in the category of await notice, the learned counsel for the Petitioners points out that a similar challenge raised in Writ Petition No.11840 of 2024 was accepted by this Court and the said Petition was allowed by quashing and setting aside specific condition in advertisement dated 30.01.2024. 2. We find that the prayer in the present Petition is also challenging the very condition in the same advertisement dated 30.01.2024. 1 of 2 2025:BHC-AUG:18575-DB (( 2 )) 906-WP-1048-2025 3. Since the relief claimed by the Petitioners in this Petition has been already effectively granted by judgment and order dated 17.03.2025 passed in Writ Petition No.11840 of 2024 (Nitin Ramesh Rathod and others Vs. State of Maharashtra and others), no further orders are necessary in this Petition and it is accordingly disposed of. [ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ] [ MANISH PITALE, J. ] SMS 2 of 2