Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 672 (UTT)

ROBIN TYAGI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C528/2/2025 · 2025-04-23

Vivek Bharti Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:3035 HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc Application No. 02 of 2025 23 April, 2025 Robin Tyagi --Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & Anr. --Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Anuj Kumar Tyagi, Advocate for the petitioner through V.C. Mr. Akshay Latwal, A.G.A. for the State Mr. Brahm Dev, Advocate for respondent no.2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Vivek Bharti Sharma, J. By means of present petition, petitioner seeks to quash the summoning order dated 21.12.2024 passed by A.C.J.M., Roorkee, District Hardiwar and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.1059/2024, “State vs. Robin”, under Sections 323, 498-A, 504 of IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the court of A.C.J.M., Roorkee, District Haridwar, on the basis of settlement arrived at between the parties. 2. In view of the fact that a Compounding Application was filed by the parties before this Court, this Court, vide order dated 08.04.2025, had directed the parties to appear before the Secretary, DLSA, Haridwar to get their statements recorded and to verify the compromise deed. 3. Pursuant to such order, Secretary, DLSA, Haridwar has submitted report dated 15.04.2025 which indicates that the 1 2025:UHC:3035 parties have settled the dispute amicably and have also verified the contents of the compromise. 4. In view of the above, Compounding Application IA No.1/2025 is allowed. As a consequence thereof, summoning order dated 21.12.2024 passed by A.C.J.M., Roorkee, District Hardiwar and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.1059/2024, “State vs. Robin”, under Sections 323, 498-A, 504 of IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the court of A.C.J.M., Roorkee, District Haridwar, are hereby quashed. 5. Accordingly, present petition is disposed of, on the basis of compromise/settlement arrived at between the parties. (Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.) 23.04.2025 Rajni 2 RAJINI GUSAIN Digitally signed by RAJINI GUSAIN DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=97cfa6e4cbd49c07b876db48448a c3701a9ae475a2547e4b7f1d9b1f17d01342 , postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=8D039BC77BD1A2222B4DF 4FC80D4557562F95BEBA013F530616A158 A0A878BD8, cn=RAJINI GUSAIN Date: 2025.04.24 17:25:00 +05'30'