Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67198 (KAR)

SMT. DEVAKI R v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

WP/13445/2025 · 2025-11-26

Jyoti M

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49021 WP No. 13445 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 13445 OF 2025 (S-KSRTC) BETWEEN: SMT. R.DEVAKI, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, W/O. V.NAGARAJU, PERSONAL ASSISTANT, MECHANICAL DEPARTMENT, KSRTC, CENTRAL OFFICES, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAVEEN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. S.B.MUKKANNAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSRTC, CENTRAL OFFICES, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027. 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, KSRTC, CENTRAL OFFICES, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027. 3. SMT. R.ANITHAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, PERSONAL SECRETARY, B.M.T.C, CENTRAL OFFICES, Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49021 WP No. 13445 of 2025 K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027. 4. SRI. H.C.SHIVABASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, PERSONAL SECRETARY, KSRTC, CENTRAL OFFICES, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560027. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Naveen Kumar., counsel on behalf of Sri.Mukkannappa.S.B., for the petitioner has appeared in person and submits that a memo has been filed stating that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be disposed of in terms of the memo. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about not pressing of the petition. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49021 WP No. 13445 of 2025 The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, pending interlocutory applications, if any stand disposed of and the interim direction if any stands discharged. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE KMV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17