Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67187 (MAD)

Rajesh v. The State rep by The Inspector of Police

CRL RC/809/2025 · 2025-06-19

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.R.C.No.809 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19.06.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.R.C.No.809 of 2025 Rajesh .... Petitioner Vs The State rep by The Inspector of Police Prohibition and Enforcement Wing, Tiruppur District. Crime No.77 of 2025. .... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 438 & 442 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to set aside the order dated 28.05.2025 made in Crl.M.P.No.180 of 2025 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Palladam, by allowing the above Criminal Revision Case. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Vinoth Kumar For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R This Criminal Revision has been filed challenging the order dated 28.05.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.180 of 2025 by the Judicial Magistrate, Palladam, thereby dismissing the petition seeking return of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.809 of 2025 the property. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record. 3. The petitioner owned a TATA Indica Car bearing Registration No.TN-10-E-8128. The said vehicle was used for the illegal transportation of illicit liquor. The car, along with the liquor, was seized and produced before the Judicial Magistrate, Palladam, pursuant to the registration of the FIR in Crime No.77 of 2025 for the offences punishable under Section 4(1)(A) TNP Act r/w 318, 336 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Though the petitioner was arrayed as A7, the vehicle was subsequently confiscated through confiscation proceedings dated 08.05.2025. 4. In view of the above, this Court finds no infirmity or illegality in the order dated 28.05.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.180 of 2025 by the Judicial Magistrate, Palladam. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the confiscation order passed by the Additional Superintendent of Police, Prohibition and Enforcement Wing, Tiruppur https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.809 of 2025 District. 5. In the result, this Criminal Revision Case stands dismissed. 19.06.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order Lpp To 1. The Judicial Magistrate, Palladam. 2. The Inspector of Police Prohibition and Enforcement Wing, Tiruppur District. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.809 of 2025 Lpp Crl.R.C.No.809 of 2025 19.06.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis