Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67186 (KAR)

SRI S MAHENDRA v. SRI B N SESHADRI

WP/15538/2021 · 2025-08-18

K Manmadha Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31769 W.P. No.15538/2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.15538/2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. S. MAHENDRA S/O LATE NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/O FLOWER STREET PANDAVAPURA TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571434. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. LAVANYA K, ADV., FOR SRI. JNANESH KUMAR K, ADV.,) AND: 1. SRI. B.N. SESHADRI S/O LATE NEELAKANTA RAO AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS MEDICAL PRACTITIONER MUNICIPAL OFFICE ROAD PANDAVAPURA TOWN-571434. 2. TOWN PANCHAYATH NOW ITS TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL PANDAVAPURA TOWN MANDYA DISTRICT-571434 REP. BY ITS CHIEF OFFICER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VISHWANATH R. HEGDE, ADV., FOR R1 SRI. G.M. ANANDA, ADV., FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION, QUASHING THE ORDER AT ANNEXURE-F, DATED 12.07.2021 PASSED BY THE LEARNED CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT PANDAVAPURA, MANDYA DISTRICT ON I.A.NO.9 IN SUIT O.S.NO.190/2005 & ETC. Digitally signed by ARSHIFA BAHAR KHANAM Location: High Court of karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31769 W.P. No.15538/2021 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 22.09.2023 seeking withdrawal of the petition and submits that O.S.No.190/2005 on the file of Civil Judge and JMFC, Pandavapura, has been settled and ended with settlement between the parties. Now the petitioner is no more to comply with the office objection raised for signature. 2. Memo and submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that he is also not in touch with the parties to seek instructions. 4. If at all there is any dispute between the parties, the parties are at liberty to proceed against. 5. With the above observation, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE BSR/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21