Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67181 (ALL)

SATYAPAL SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/19563/2025 · 2025-07-09

Prakash Padia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:110637 Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19563 of 2025 Petitioner :- Satyapal Singh And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vageesh Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. 1. Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. The petitioners have preferred the present petition inter alia with the following prayers:- "i. TO ISSUE a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned order dated 03.04.2025 passed by the respondent no. 2/District Magistrate, District Shahjahanpur for recovery of the amount of Rs. 35,703/- from each of the petitioners and deposit in Gram Panchayat Fund of Village Panchayat Chikatiya Shahjanpur." 3. It is argued that immediately after the petitioner came to know about the impugned recovery order dated 03.04.2025, a representation was submitted by him before Respondent no. 2 namely District Magistrate, District Shahjahanpur, copy of which is appended as Annexure-8 to the writ petition but till date no decision has been taken in the matter. On the other hand respondents are harassing the petitioner pursuant to the aforesaid recovery certificate. 4. On the other hand, it is argued by learned Standing Counsel that in case, the petitioner will submit a reply before the respondent No.2/District Magistrate, District Shahjahanpur, he will pass appropriate orders in the matter expeditiously. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of directing the petitioners to file another copy of reply ventilating all their grievances before respondent No.2/District Magistrate, Shahajahanpur, along with all relevant documents and papers on which the petitioners are making reliance and a certified copy of this order within a period of three weeks from today. In case, if it is so within the stipulated period, the respondent No.2 will pass appropriate orders most expeditiously and preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of submission of reply. 7. For a period of eight weeks or till the time decision has been taken whichever is earlier no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 Swati Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad