Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67178 (ALL)

MAHMOOD @ MAHMOOD KHAN v. ANIL KUMAR PANDEY AND 18 OTHERS

A227/6100/2025 · 2025-07-06

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:106072 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6100 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mahmood @ Mahmood Khan Respondent :- Anil Kumar Pandey And 18 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajeev Kumar Upadhyay,Shashi Kant Shukla Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed against the order dated 28.5.2025 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sant Kabir Nagar. By the order dated 28.5.2025, the ex parte interim injunction has been granted to the plaintiff. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff has submitted that against the order impugned, petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing an application under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC for setting aside the injunction order. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner will file an application under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC, within a week. 5. In case such an application is filed, the same shall be considered and decided by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sant Kabir Nagar, within next three weeks. 6. Learned counsel for the plaintiff-respondent submitted that his client will participate in the proceedings and will not seek any undue adjournments. 7. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 7.7.2025 Rishabh [Manish Kumar Nigam, J.] Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad