Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67176 (KAR)

JAYAMMA v. GO DIGIT GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

MFA/7865/2024 · 2025-12-13

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI & SRI. RAVI S. SAMPRATHI, MEMBER M.F.A.No.7865/2024 (MV-D) (Lok Adalat No.661/2025) BETWEEN: 1 . JAYAMMA W/O LATE.KARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, 2 . SHIVARAJKUMAR S/O LATE. KARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,. 3 . LOKESH C.K S/O LATE. KARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, 4 . CHIKKAKARIYAPPA S/O LATE. KARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, ALL ARE R/OF OF NO.30, C/O VAISHNAVI GARDENIA, S. M.ROAD, JALAHALLI CROSS, T. DASARAHALLI, BENGALURU-57. Digitally signed by DEEPU M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2 PERMANENT RESIDENT AT CHANDANAHOSAHALLI SOMPUR HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. ...Appellants (BY SRI. GURUDEV PRASAD K T) AND 1 . GO DIGIT GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED BY ITS MANAGER, CONSULATE 1, 2ND FLOOR, RICHMOND ROAD, SHANTHALA NAGAR, ASHOKNAGAR, BENGALURU-560 025. 2 . PUSHPAK FRIGHT CARRIEARS, C/O SHOURY TRANSPORT CO., WARD NO.13, BLOCK NO.6, U. P.NAGAR, RAWABHATA, RAIPUR CHATTISGARAH, AURAGABAD-431 001, RAIPUR-492 001. Respondents (By SRI. B.C SHIVANNE GOWDA., ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DT.05.09.2024 PASSED IN MVC NO.1309/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE XXIV ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND ACJM, MEMBER, MACT, BENGALURU, (SCCH-26), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION 3 THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.1,25,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Twenty Five Thousand Only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which, the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4 4. The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant/claimant, on proper identification. 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER TS