Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67172 (PNJ)

RAM RATAN MEENA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

CWP/36/2013 · 2025-04-21

Vinod S Bhardwaj

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 206 CWP-36-2013 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.04.2025 Ram Ratan Meena ...Petitioner VERSUS Union of India and others ...Respondents 206-A CWP-138-2013 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.04.2025 Surjit Singh ...Petitioner VERSUS Union of India and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Rajeev Anand, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Piyush Khanna, Advocate for the respondent(s). ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) Raising similar issues, both these writ petitions had been adjourned sine die vide order dated 08.01.2018 with a direction to list these matters consequent upon decision of Civil Appeal Nos.3938-3961 of 2016. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners contends that Civil Appeal Nos.3938-3961 of 2016 titled as ‘Union of India and others ETC. ETC. Vs. HC/GD R.C. Mandi ETC. ETC.’ preferred by the Union of India already stands decided vide order dated 01.05.2019 and colour blindness is no more a disqualification for further promotion in view MANGAL SINGH 2025.04.22 11:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 206 CWP-36-2013 (O&M) and 01 connected case of the judgment dated 28.02.2013 passed in a batch of Writ Petitions(C) including Writ Petition No.356/2013 titled as ‘Sh. P. Suresh Kumar Vs. Union of India and others’ passed by the High Court of Delhi. Learned counsel for the respondent(s)-UOI is not in a position to dispute the same. The present writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the aforesaid judgment dated 28.02.2013 passed by the High Court of Delhi in the matter of Sh. P. Suresh Kumar (supra). Respondents are directed to re-determine the consequential benefits that would accrue in favour of the petitioners within a period of 03 months of receipt of a certified copy of this order and the admissible benefits be released thereafter not later than 02 months from the determination. All pending civil misc. application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 21.04.2025 JUDGE Mangal Singh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MANGAL SINGH 2025.04.22 11:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document