Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67165 (ALL)

RANJEET ALIAS MASTANA v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/20480/2025 · 2025-07-24

Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:123170 Court No. - 87 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 20480 of 2025 Applicant :- Ranjeet Alias Mastana Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Gaurav Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents. 2. The accused/applicant is involved in Case Crime No.96 of 2025, under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Sefai, District Etawah. 3. Learned counsel for the accused/applicant submitted that applicant has falsely been implicated in the case. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that in gang chart two criminal cases are attributed to the accused/applicant, in which he has already been released on bail by orders of competent authority. Copies of bail orders is annexed as Annexure Nos.3 and 4 to the accompanying bail application. 4. Apart from that one case of criminal history has been assigned to the accused/applicant, in which he has already been released on bail and same has been duly explained through supplementary affidavit. Copy of bail order passed by order passed by CJM, Etawah has been filed therewith. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that applicant accused/applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. There is no material in support of allegation made in the FIR. The accused applicant has derived any temporal, physical or economic advantage by indulging in gangsters and anti-social activities. Bar on bail provided in Section 19(4) of the U.P. Gangsters And Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Act is not been applicable on the facts of the present case. The accused applicant is held in jail custody since 20.05.2025. 6. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayed for bail, but he did not dispute the factual submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant, which are based on record. 7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on merits, let the applicant Ranjeet Alias Mastana be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned subject to the following conditions: i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence. ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses. iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court. iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission. v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 8. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the applicant in accordance with law. 9. The bail application is allowed. Order Date :- 25.7.2025 Ashish/- Digitally signed by :- ASHISH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad