2025:UHC:6669 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No. 840 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Ashutosh Thakral, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, learned A.G.A. with Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. The present applicant ‘Suhail @ Rana’ S/o Jiyaulhaq is praying for bail in relation to First Information Report dated 28.09.2024 bearing FIR No. 812 of 2024 P.S. Manglore, District Haridwar, wherein, the present applicant has been implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 65(2) of BNS, 2023 r/w Section 5(m)/6 of POCSO Act. 4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated, which is evident from the fact that in the FIR the allegation of rape has been alleged but as per the medical report the hymen was found to be intact. He submits that there is no sign of rape and the applicant has been implicated with malafide intent. He also submits that the age of the victim as per the prosecution was 11 years and at the time of incident the applicant though claimed to be juvenile but the applicant was rejected. 5. Apart from this, he submits that the present applicant is languishing in jail since 08.10.2024 and the chargesheet has already been filed on 25.11.2024 and as such there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant and the applicant has no previous criminal history. 6. On the other side, learned A.G.A. Mr. Siddhartha Bisht submits though as per the medical report hymen was found to be intact but there is some redness, however he has not disputed this fact that the chargesheet has already been filed on 25.11.2024, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the present applicant and the applicant has no previous 2025:UHC:6669 criminal history and is languishing in jail since 08.10.2024. 7. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that the chargesheet has already been filed on 25.11.2024 and as such there is no need of custodial interrogation of the present applicant and the applicant is languishing in jail since 08.10.2024, this court is of the view that the applicant deserves of bail. 8. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case the bail application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant ‘Suhail @ Rana’ be released on bail on furnishing his personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 30.07.2025 PR 2025:UHC:6669