Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:9926
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 1034 of 2025 1 - Sandeep Laskar S/o Nand Kumar Laskar Aged About 25 Years R/o Uktipara Ward No. 13, Village - Posara Koni Bilaspur P.S. - Koni District - Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Applicant(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through S.H.O. Police Station Koni District- Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) For Applicant (s) : Shri Aman Kesarwani, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Vivek Sharma, PL (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma)
Order on Board 27/02/2025 The applicant has filed this bail application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrrik Suraksha Sanhita for grant of regular bail as he is in custody in connection with Crime No. 507/2024 registered at police station Koni, District Bilaspur (CG) for the offence punishable under Section376 IPC and Section 4 & 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. SUGUNA DUBEY Digitally signed by SUGUNA DUBEY Date: 2025.03.01 13:39:15 +0530
2
2. Case of the prosecution in brief is that report was lodged by the complainant alleging that on 18.11.2023, the applicant committed forceful sexual intercourse and thereafter continued on the pretext of marriage. It is further alleged that when she insisted, he put vermilion on her forehead on 08.02.2024 stating that he had married her. When it was objected by her, he married in the presence of the family members and on 1411.2024, he committed maar peeth with her and therefore, she lodged a report against the applicant.
4. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. He submits that they were having love affair and she was major and a consenting party. He submits that the applicant is in jail since 04.01.2025, the charge sheet has been filed and the trial is likely to take some time, he is ready and willing to comply with any of the conditions which may be imposed upon him and thus, it is submitted that the application be allowed and the applicant be released on bail.
5.
Learned counsel for the respondent/State, on the other hand, has opposed the bail application.
6. Victim and her mother are present before the Court and they have no objection if the applicant is granted bail.
7. Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.
8. On due consideration of the rival submissions and the fact that the applicant is in jail since 04.01.2025, the charge sheet has been filed and looking to the fact that the prosecutrix and her mother have no objection and that the final disposal of the trial is likely to take
3 sufficiently long time, the present application deserves to be allowed. Accordingly, his bail application is allowed.
9. It is directed that in the event of applicant executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety to the satisfaction of the concerned trial court, he shall be released on bail on the following conditions: i) He shall appear before the trial court regularly on each and every date, unless exempted from appearance. ii) He shall not make any attempt to tamper with the prosecution witnesses. Iii) the applicant is directed not to communicate/contact in any manner with the prosecutrix, her family members and the witnesses cited in the charge sheet any other person concerned or attempt to ask for any favour in the trial directly or indirectly.
Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge