IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 153 LABH SINGH STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) The petitioner is seeking a direction to the residential plot/commercial plot in a well dated 09.11.2010 (Annexure P 2. Learned the petitioner had been acquired by the Kurukshetra Development Board but the respondents are not co residential plot/commercial plot in a well for Rehabilitation a 1). He also submits that the petiti 21.05.2025 (Annexure P far. 3. Issue notice to the 4. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. AG, Haryana accepts 5. Heard. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16818-2025 DATE OF DECISION: Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Mr. Ivneet Singh Pabla, Advocate for the petitioner. ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) The petitioner is seeking a direction to the residential plot/commercial plot in a well-developed area in terms of the Polic dated 09.11.2010 (Annexure P-1). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the land of the petitioner had been acquired by the Kurukshetra Development Board but the are not considering the claim of the residential plot/commercial plot in a well-developed area in terms for Rehabilitation and Resettlement of Oustees dated 09.11.2010 (Annexure P 1). He also submits that the petitioner has sent a 21.05.2025 (Annexure P-3) to the respondents but no ue notice to the respondents. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. AG, notice on behalf of the respondents. Heard. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2025 DATE OF DECISION: 28.07.2025 … Petitioner (s) ... Respondent(s) HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL DEEPAK MANCHANDA , Advocate for the petitioner. The petitioner is seeking a direction to the respondents to allot a eveloped area in terms of the Policy for the petitioner submits that although the land of the petitioner had been acquired by the Kurukshetra Development Board but the nsidering the claim of the petitioner for allotment of a developed area in terms of the Policy tlement of Oustees dated 09.11.2010 (Annexure P- representation in this regard on but no action has been taken so At the asking of the Court, Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. AG, notice on behalf of the respondents. to allot a y for the petitioner submits that although the land of the petitioner had been acquired by the Kurukshetra Development Board but the for allotment of a licy - representation in this regard on action has been taken so At the asking of the Court, Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. AG, SWARNJIT SINGH 2025.07.28 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-16818-2025 -2- 6. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 21.05.2025 (Annexure P-3) in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE 28.07.2025 SwarnjitS Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SWARNJIT SINGH 2025.07.28 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document