Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67145 (KAR)

M/S SHREE VAIKUNTAM LIFE SPACES PVT LTD v. MRS. LATHA SURESH BHANDARY

CMP/392/2025 · 2025-10-24

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42235 CMP No. 392 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 392 OF 2025 BETWEEN: M/S. SHREE VAIKUNTAM LIFE SPACES PVT. LTD., REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.10-10-427/1, LAXMAN COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, GOLIKATTA BAZAR, BUNDER, MANGALURU - 575 001. REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR. KARKALA ANANTH KAMATH. …PETITIONER (BY SRI RAKESH KINI, ADVOCATE) AND: MRS. LATHA SURESH BHANDARY, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, W/O SURESH BHANDARY, R/AT KALASH, 2ND CROSS, BEHIND M M BEKARY KALBAVI, NEAR KODICAL SCHOOL, ASHOK NAGAR, MANGALURU - 575 006. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI DHANANJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 TO R-3) THIS CMP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11(6) OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, PRAYING TO APPOINT A SOLE ARBITRATOR INTERMS OF CLAUSE 24 OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 29.05.2023 (DOCUMENT NO. 1) AND AS PER THE ARBITRATION NOTICE DATED 02.04.2025, ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER AT (DOCUMENT NO. 5), FOR THE PURPOSE OF ADJUDICATING THE DISPUTE BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE RESPONDENT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42235 CMP No. 392 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs; a. 'Appoint a sole Arbitrator in terms of Clause 24 of the Agreement dated 29.05.2023 (Document No. 1) and as per the Arbitration Notice dated 02.04.2025, issued by the Petitioner at (Document No. 5), for the purpose of adjudicating the dispute between the Petitioner and the Respondent. b. Pass such other order/s as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant in the circumstances of the case, including an order as to the costs of the present Petition, in the interest of justice and equity." 2. After arguing for sometime, both the counsels submit the matter could be referred to arbitration of a sole arbitrator, by leaving all the conditions open and the arbitration being held in Mangalore city. 3. In that view of the matter, I pass the following; ORDER i. CMP is allowed. ii. Sri.Moosa Kunhi Nayarmoole., a former District Judge of the District Judiciary, State of Karnataka is appointed as a sole arbitrator to - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42235 CMP No. 392 of 2025 arbitrate the dispute between the parties, the arbitration proceedings to be conducted in Mangalore city. iii. All contentions are left open to be decided by the learned arbitrator. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 90