CWP-16762 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (155) Mukesh Kumar and others The Registrar General, Firm and Societies, CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. the Constitution of India, a (Annexure P Haryana (respondent No.2) No.2 and 3, has been dismissed. 2. which is impugned before this Court, is Registrar General, Firms and further submits that earlier also, this issue was raised in the same was not decided by the Registrar General, Firms and Societies, Haryana (respondent No.1) rendered infructuous, on account of completion of election process therefore, the petitioner filing the instant writ petition, 6762-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Mukesh Kumar and others Versus The Registrar General, Firm and Societies, Haryana and HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Ashwani Bakshi, Advocate for the petitioners. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) Through the instant writ petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a challenge is thrown to the order dated (Annexure P-16), as passed by the State Registrar, Firms and Societies, Haryana (respondent No.2), whereby, the appeal preferred by the petitioners No.2 and 3, has been dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner which is impugned before this Court, is Registrar General, Firms and Societies, Haryana further submits that earlier also, this issue was raised in the same was not decided by the Registrar General, Firms and Societies, Haryana (respondent No.1), in a time bound manner rendered infructuous, on account of completion of election process therefore, the petitioners have now straightway approached this Court, by filing the instant writ petition, challenging the order (supra). 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16762-2025 Date of Decision : 29.05.2025 …Petitioners Haryana and others ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI , Advocate the instant writ petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of challenge is thrown to the order dated 07.08.2024 State Registrar, Firms and Societies, , whereby, the appeal preferred by the petitioners Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly admits that the order, which is impugned before this Court, is an appealable order, before the Societies, Haryana (respondent No.1). He further submits that earlier also, this issue was raised in an appeal, however, the same was not decided by the Registrar General, Firms and Societies, bound manner, and the same was rendered infructuous, on account of completion of election process, and straightway approached this Court, by challenging the order (supra). the instant writ petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of 07.08.2024 State Registrar, Firms and Societies, , whereby, the appeal preferred by the petitioners the order, the He appeal, however, the same was not decided by the Registrar General, Firms and Societies, and the same was , and straightway approached this Court, by MANPREET SINGH 2025.05.30 14:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-16762 3. statutory remedy, as available to the petitioner apprehension that The instant writ petition is purely a misconceived motion not require any interference, at this stage. 4. 5. Firms and Societies, Haryana (respondent No.1), for redressal of their grievance, as sought through the instant writ petition. 6. and Societies, Haryana (respondent No.1), by filing apt motion, within a period of one month, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, the latter, shall decide the same withi 7. May 29, 2025 Manpreet 6762-2025 This Court does not find the reasons sufficient to statutory remedy, as available to the petitioner apprehension that their appeal will not be decided in a time bound manner The instant writ petition is purely a misconceived motion not require any interference, at this stage. Consequently, the instant writ petition is However, the petitioners are relegated to the Registrar General, Firms and Societies, Haryana (respondent No.1), for redressal of their grievance, as sought through the instant writ petition. In case, the petitioners approaches the Registrar General, Firms and Societies, Haryana (respondent No.1), by filing apt motion, within a period of one month, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, the latter, shall decide the same within six months, thereafter. Ordered accordingly. 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2 ind the reasons sufficient to sidetrack the statutory remedy, as available to the petitioners, only on account of the appeal will not be decided in a time bound manner The instant writ petition is purely a misconceived motion, and the same does Consequently, the instant writ petition is disposed of. However, the petitioners are relegated to the Registrar General, Firms and Societies, Haryana (respondent No.1), for redressal of their grievance, as sought through the instant writ petition. In case, the petitioners approaches the Registrar General, Firms and Societies, Haryana (respondent No.1), by filing apt motion, within a period of one month, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, n six months, thereafter. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No sidetrack the , only on account of the appeal will not be decided in a time bound manner. the same does However, the petitioners are relegated to the Registrar General, Firms and Societies, Haryana (respondent No.1), for redressal of their In case, the petitioners approaches the Registrar General, Firms and Societies, Haryana (respondent No.1), by filing apt motion, within a period of one month, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, MANPREET SINGH 2025.05.30 14:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment