Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67101 (KAR)

JAYANTHI v. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER

MSA/45/2024 · 2025-11-26

M G Uma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48978 MSA No. 45 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 45 OF 2024 (LA) BETWEEN: 1. JAYANTHI W/O KRISHNAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 2. B J SHRIRAM S/O B V JANARDHAN AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 3. B J NAGARATHNA W/O MURALIDHARAN AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT BYLAHALLI VILLAGE SALAGAME HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK-573201 …APPELLANTS (BY SMT. SHARADAMBA A.R., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER H.R.P. 2, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, 1ST FLOOR, HASSAN - 573 201 …RESPONDENT THIS MSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.54(2) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 05.04.2019 PASSED IN LAC. APPEAL NO.336/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE 5TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 14.09.2005 PASSED IN LAC NO.342/2000 ON THE FILE OF THE Digitally signed by NANDINI B G Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48978 MSA No. 45 of 2024 ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) HASSAN) PARTLY ALLOWING THE REFERENCE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC.18 OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT. THIS MSA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants is absent. No representation. 2. Order sheet dated 25.09.2025 reads as under: "Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks short accommodation to cure the office objections including payment of Court fee. Finally, two week's time is granted to cure the office objections on payment of cost of Rs.500/- to the Karnataka State High Court Legal Service Committee. " 3. Inspite of that, neither cost is paid nor office objections are complied with. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. The matter is listed for eighth time for compliance of office objections. Still, the office objections are not complied with. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the matter. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48978 MSA No. 45 of 2024 4. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non compliance of office objections. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE PNV CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19