Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6710 (RAJ)

MAHAVEER JAIN v. SH. RAJESH KUMAR YADAV (IAS)

CCP/170/2025 · 2025-09-18

Ganesh Ram Meena

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:38140] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 170/2025 1. Mahaveer Jain (Since Deceased) through Legal Representatives 1/1. Smt. Indira Devi (Wife), Resident Of Tehsil Gali, Jhalrapatan, District Jhalawar (Rajasthan) 1/2. Manish Dangi (Son), Resident Of Tehsil Gali, Jhalrapatan, District Jhalawar (Rajasthan). 1/3. Amit Dangi (Son), Resident Of Tehsil Gali, Jhalrapatan, District Jhalawar (Rajasthan). 1/4. Menal Saklecha W/o Atul Saklecha (Daughter), Resident Of Tehsil Gali, Jhalrapatan, District Jhalawar (Rajasthan). ----Petitioners/Applicants Versus 1. Sh. Rajesh Kumar Yadav (IAS), Principal Secretary, Local Self Government/department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Sh. Inderjeet Singh (IAS), Director, Local Bodies, Local Self Government/department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Sh. Hemendra Singh, Executive Officer, Municipality, Jhalawar. ----Respondents/Non-Applicants For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anubodh Subodh Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr Manoj Kumar on behalf of Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 18/09/2025 1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioners alleging non-compliance of the order dated 29.01.2024, whereby the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court disposed of the writ petition [2025:RJ-JP:38140] (2 of 2) [CCP-170/2025] issuing direction to the respondents contemnors to decide the pending matter of the petitioners strictly in accordance with law. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents contemnors submits that the case of the petitioners has been decided and the Municipal Board, Jhalarapatan has already issued regularisation letter in the name of the petitioners on 04.09.2025. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents contemnors has also placed the letter dated 04.09.2025 before this Court, which is taken on record. 4. In view of issuance of letter dated 04.09.2025, this Court is of the opinion that the respondents contemnors have complied with the direction of the Court, the present contempt petition is disposed of and the notices are discharged. 5. Any pending application/s, if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /5