Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6710 (KAR)

M/S SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO. LTD., v. NIZAMUDDIN S/O. GOUSMUDIN BARUDWALE,

CRL.A/100320/2018 · 2025-04-02

Shivashankar Amarannavar

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5924 CRL.A No. 100320 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.100320 OF 2018 BETWEEN: M/S. SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO. LTD., A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, HAVING ITS ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE AT MOOKAMBIKA COMPLEX, 3RD FLOOR, MYLAPORE, CHENNAI, HAVING ITS DIVISIONAL OFFICE AT 3RD FLOOR, KALBURGI SQUARE, OPP: VIVEKANAND HOSPITAL, HUBBALLI – 580 009. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, AND POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, SHRI.PRAVEER SHETTY S/O. SACHIDANANDA SHETTY, AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: FILED EXECUTIVE, SFTC, R/O: HUBBALLI. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SHREEVATSA HEGDE, ADVOCATE) AND: NIZAMUDDIN S/O. GOUSMUDIN BARUDWALE, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: H.NO.13, VISHAL NAGAR, GUDIHAL ROAD, HUBBALLI, DIST: DHARWAD. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAM P. GHORPADE, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/S 378(4) OF CR.P.C. SEEKING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 22.05.2012 PASSED BY THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC COURT, HUBBALLI, IN C.C.NO.805/2012 AND FURTHER BE PLEASED TO CONVICT THE RESPONDENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 138 OF N.I. ACT. Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5924 CRL.A No. 100320 of 2018 THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the appellant files a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal. 2. The memo reads thus, “Here in the memo on behalf of the Appellant is as under: The Account being settled in the top noted case, appellant may be accorded permission to withdraw the same. Hence this memo.” 3. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE RKM/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41