Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010063052019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SES 3 FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 2889 OF 2019 Between: Nimmagadda Venkata Siva Naga Mohan Rao, S/o. Naga Veera Basavaiah, Flat No. 601, Swarnamukhi Apartment, HIG No. 534, 535 Phase - 6, KPHB Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Stamps and Registration, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Sub Registrar, Mandadam, Thulluru Mandal, Guntur District. 3. The Andhra Pradesh Capital Regional Development Authority, APCRDA, Rep. by its Commissioner, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 4. The Competent Authority, APCRDA, unit - 16, lingayapalem, Guntur District. 5. Puli Veeraiah, S/o. Puli Francis, r/o. Uddandarayunipalem village, Thulluru Mandal, Guntur District. ...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that m the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, writ or direction nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the seeking more particularly one in the respondents 2 to 4 in certificate to register plots of land pooling SPUN1T1608047799-1C4, SPUN IT1608047799-1G1 Nos. SPUNIT1608047799-1 C5 and SPUN1T1608047799-1I2, issued by the 4 5'^ respondent to third parties, pertaining to Plot No. 43, Block-2061, Sub-Plot C4 of City-7, Plot No. 26, Colony No. 616, Block-2083, Sub-Plot G1 of th respondent in favour of Colony No. 392, City-17 Plot No. 8, Colony No. 393, Block-2069, Sub-Plot C5 of City-7 and Plot No. 20, Colony No. 616, Block-2092 Sub-Plot 12 provisions of the Andhra of City-17, for being illegal, arbitrary, violative of Pradesh Capital Development Authority Act, 2014, and the Rules made there under, contrary to the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908, and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent Nos, allow any alienations in favour of third parties by the 5 to plots in the land pooling certificates issued by the 4 No. 43, Colony No, 392, Block-2061, Sub-Plot 04 of City-7 Plot No. 26, Colony No. 616, Block-2083, Sub-Plot G1 of City-17 Plot No. 8, Colony No. 393, Block-2069, Sub-Plot C5 of City-7 and Plot No. 20, Colony No. 616, Block- 2092, Sub-Plot 12 of City-17.
2 to 4 not to respondent pertaining respondent for the Plot th th lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos. alienations in favour of third parties by the 5 plots in land pooling certificates issued by the 4 Colony No. 392, Block-2061, Sub-Plot C4 of City-7; Plot No, 26, Colony No, 616, Block-2083, Sub-Plot G1 of City-17; Plot No. 8, 2 to 4 not to allow any respondent pertaining to the th respondent of Plot No. 43, Colony No. 393, Block-
2069, Sub-Plot C5 of City-7 and Plot No. 20, Colony No. 616, Block-2092, Sub-Plot 12 of City-17, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SRINIVASA RAO BODDULURI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP) Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4: SRI KARUMANCHI INDRANEEL BABU Counsel for the Respondent No.5: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following order:
APHC010063052019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 05H H-LtS [2693] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 2889/2019 Between:
1. Nimmagadda Venkata Siva Naga Mohan Rao, S/o. Naga Veera Basavaiah, Flat no. 601, Swarnamukhi Apartment, HIG No.534, 535 Phase - 6, KPHB colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER AND
1. The State of AP, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Stamps And Registration, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District and 4 others ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner:
I.Mr. SRINIVASA RAO BODDULURI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)
2. Mr. KARUMANCHI INDRANEEL BABU
'»■ The Court made the following Order: I Considering the
submissions made by Mr. Vinod Kumar,
learned counsel representing the writ petitioner and in view of the letter dated 15.09.2025 addressed to the Registry, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- B CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to SRI. SRINIVASA RAO BODDULURI Advocate [OPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP) High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
3. One CC to SRI. KARUMANCHI INDRANEEL BABU, Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CD Copies sree
HIGH COURT DATED;19/09/2025
ORDER WP NO. 2889 OF 2019 sf 2 2 SEP 2025 Jk) DISMISSING THE W.P.
AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS