-1- 130-CWP-16747-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16747-2025 Date of decision: 23.07.2025 Dharmender Kumar @ Dharmender ….Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY, JUDGE Present:- Mr. Neeraj Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen S. Bhardwaj, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. ..… SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral) This petition has been preferred by the petitioner/borrower challenging the impugned notice dated 18.03.2025 (Annexure P-6), which is an intimation by respondent No. 3/Naib Tehsildar-Cum- Executive Magistrate, Sohna, Gurugram, Haryana, for taking physical possession of the secured asset pursuant to the order dated 30.08.2024 passed by respondent No. 2/Additional Distrit Magistrate, Gurugram, Haryana, under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. 2. Mr. Lakshay Jindal, Advocate, on instructions from Mr. Mukul Sharma, authorised Officer of respondent No. 4, has entered appearance on behalf of respondent No. 4 and filed his vakalatnama in Court, the same is taken on record, subject to payment of cost of PREETI 2025.07.24 18:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -2- 130-CWP-16747-2025 Rs. 2,000/- in favour of the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar, Association Lawyer’s Family Welfare Fund. The cost be deposited within a period of 30 days. 3. Learned counsel for the rival parties do not dispute that the loan account stands regularized and therefore, the issue raised in this petition has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (SHEEL NAGU) CHIEF JUSTICE (SANJIV BERRY) 23.07.2025 JUDGE preeti i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No PREETI 2025.07.24 18:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document