- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50490 WP No. 36474 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 36474 OF 2025 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. AKSHYA SHENOY @ M. AKSHAYA SHENOY D/O SRI. MYSORE JAGANNATH SHENOY W/O SRI VINAY RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO.967, JLB ROAD, LAKSHMIPURA, MYSORE-570004 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH KUMAR A.V., ADVOCATE) AND: THE COMMISSIONER MYSORE CITY CORPORATION, MYSORE CITY-570001 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED PROVISIONAL ORDER BEARING NUMBER NAM:MYNAPA/NAYOSHA/TAM(11)/2025-26 DATED 08.09.2025 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-E. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50490 WP No. 36474 of 2025 ORAL ORDER The petitioner has challenged a confirmation order bearing No.ªÉÄÊ£À¥Á/£ÀAiÉÆñÁ/vÁA(11)/-/2025-26 dated 08.09.2025 passed by the respondent under Section 321(3) of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976. 2. When it was brought to the notice of the learned counsel for the petitioner that an appeal remedy is provided under Section 443-A of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 before the District Judge, the learned counsel fairly accepted it. He submits that he would file an appeal and prays that till the filing of an appeal, the respondent be directed not to take any further action. 3. In view of the aforesaid submission, this petition stands disposed off permitting the petitioner to file an appeal before the District Judge as provided under Section 443-A of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976, within a period of fifteen days from today. Until then, the respondent is directed not to take any further action pursuant to the confirmation order dated 08.09.2025. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50490 WP No. 36474 of 2025 4. It is made clear that this protection is only for the limited purpose of enabling the petitioner to file an appeal before the District Judge. It is open for the petitioner to seek interim relief in the appeal that may be filed before the District Judge. 5. In view of disposal of the petition, pending I.As., if any, do not survive for consideration and the same stand disposed off. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE PMR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39