[2025:RJ-JP:8545] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 224/2025 1. Smt. Rubina Bano @ Diksha D/o Shri Hameed Khan Wife Of Shri Shriram Yadav, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Choudhary Pada, Mandawari, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa Presently R/o Plot No. 85, Aasolai Chaman Vihar Colony, Chaksu, District Jaipur Presently Residing At C-517, Vashundhara Kutumb, Bilwa, Jaipur. 2. Shriram Yadav Son Of Shri Dhanroop Yadav, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Talab Basti, Dungarbada, District Sawai Madhopur Presently R/o C-517, Vashundhara Kutumb, Bilwa, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Superintendent Of Police, Jaipur South. 3. S.H.O., Police Station Chaksu, District Jaipur Rural. 4. Hameed S/o Sakoor (Father Of Petitiner No. 1), R/o Plot No. 85, Chaman Vihar, Aasloi, Chaksu District Jaipur. 5. Irfan Son Of Saleem, (Brother Of Petitioner No. 1), R/o Plot No. 85, Chaman Vihar, Aasloi, Chaksu District Jaipur. 6. Imran S/o Saleem (Brother Of Petitioner No. 1), R/o Plot No. 85, Chaman Vihar, Aasloi, Chaksu District Jaipur. 7. Saleem Son Of Sakoor (Uncle Of Petitioner No. 1), R/o Choudhary Pada, Sabji Mandi, Mandawari, District Dausa. 8. Arbaj Son Of Saleem (Cousing Brother Of Petitioner No. 1), R/o Choudhary Pada, Sabji Mandi, Mandawari, District Dausa. 9. Arman Son Of Saleem (Cousing Brother Of Petitioner No. 1), R/o Choudhary Pada, Sabji Mandi, Mandawari, District Dausa. 10. Soyam Son Of Unknown, R/o Shriram Ki Nangal, Goner Mode, Jaipur (Jijaji Of The Petitioner No. 1), 11. Akhtar Son Of Unknown, R/o Near Masjid, Kho- Nagoriyan, Jagatpura Road, Jaipur (Jijaji Of The Petitioner No. 1). ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:8545] (2 of 3) [CRLW-224/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 25/02/2025 1. Defect(s) pointed out by the Registry is over-ruled. 2. The petitioners have preferred the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of necessary directions to the respondent authorities to provide adequate security and protection to them, as they are facing grave threat to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondent Nos.4 to 11. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are major and they solemnized their marriage at their own free will on 23.10.2024 and registered the same in the Marriage Registration Office on 27.12.2024. However, their family members are not agreeable to their marriage and have threatened them of dire consequences. He prays that adequate police protection be provided to the petitioners. 4. Though no specific instance or imminent threat has been pleaded but considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners and having regard to the facts & circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that if the petitioners are having any apprehension or threat perception about their life and liberty from their relatives, they may move an appropriate [2025:RJ-JP:8545] (3 of 3) [CRLW-224/2025] representation before the Superintendent of Police, Jaipur (South) indicating their concern with the name(s) of probable assailants. 5. If any such representation is moved by the petitioners, the Superintendent of Police, Jaipur (South) shall consider the same and after analyzing the factual situation, pass necessary orders or take action to ward off any untoward incident. 6. It is hereby clarified that this order may not be construed to be a validation of petitioners’ marriage and proof of their age. Any observation made herein shall not affect any criminal or civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners, at the instance of their relatives. 7. With these observations, this writ petition is disposed of. 8. The stay application also stands disposed of. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAHIL SONI /407