2025:UHC:8091 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA2/115/2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. (Through V.C.) 1. Mr. M. S. Pal, learned Sr. Advocate assisted by Ms. Amreen Bano, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Siddharath Bisht, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. The present applicant ‘Praveen Kumar, son of late Rajaram’, is praying for bail in relation to First Information Report dated 01.09.2024 bearing FIR No. 700 of 2024, P.S. – KotwaliJwalapur, District Haridwar wherein present applicant has been implicated for the offence punishable under Section 109, 310 (2) and 311 of BNS, 2023. 4. First bail application was rejected by this Court on 20.02.2025 and now, this second bail application has been moved on the ground that charge sheet has been already filed against the applicant for the offence punishable under Section 61 (2) of BNS, 2023 and there is no recovery from the present applicant and the applicant has been implicated only on the disclosure of his name by the other co-accused and applicant has no previous criminal history. 5. On the other side, learned A.G.A. Mr. Siddharath Bisht, have not disputed this fact that there is no recovery from the present applicant and the charge sheet has already been filed. 6. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration the fact that applicant has no previous criminal history and there is no recovery from the present applicant and the charge sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is need of custodial interrogation, this court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case the instant second bail application is allowed. 2025:UHC:8091 8. Let the applicant ‘Praveen Kumar, son of late Rajaram, be released on bail on furnishing his personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 9. It is made clear that after being released on bail, if applicant is found to be indulged in any such criminal activity, then trial court shall be at liberty take appropriate legal action against the applicant including the cancellation of bail. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 11.09.2025 SKS 2025:UHC:8091