Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67055 (KAR)

THIRUMALARAO MADALA v. PACHAVA BHAVYA

WP/26480/2025 · 2025-11-05

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45101 WP No. 26480 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 26480 OF 2025 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: THIRUMALARAO MADALA AGED 34 YEARS, S/O SRI. VENKATA NARAYANA MADALA R/A 108, KINGSTON ROYALE APARTMENT, KR PURAM, BASAVANAPURA, BANGALORE-560 036 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. A.MAHESH CHOWDHARY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. PACHAVA BHAVYA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT S.64, 2ND STAGE SRIRAMPURA NEAR VIVEKANANDA SCHOOL KUVEMPU NAGAR MYSORE- 570 023 2. VIVAAAN MADALA S/O THIRUMALARAO MADALA Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45101 WP No. 26480 of 2025 AGED MINOR REPRESENTED BY MOTHER PACHAVA BHAVYA RESIDING AT S.64, 2ND STAGE SRIRAMPURA NEAR VIVEKANANDA SCHOOL KUVEMPU NAGAR MYSORE -570 023 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. HARSHA H.M., ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED: 01.02.2025 IN CRL.MISC.NO. 394/2024 BEFORE THE HONBLE FAMILY COURT, MYSURU VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND THE CONSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS BEARING CRL.MISC.NO.305/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-L AS THE SAME ARBITRARY IN VIOLATION OF NATURE JUSTICE AND BAD IN THE EYES OF LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45101 WP No. 26480 of 2025 ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is filed questioning the final order dated 01.02.2025 in Crl.Misc.No.394/2024 filed under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. passed by the I Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Mysuru. 2. Office has taken the objection that, in the light of Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, the writ petition is not maintainable and the petitioner has to file an RPFC. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed giving liberty to the petitioner to file an RPFC within a period of one week from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 4. Registry is directed to return all the papers to the petitioner. Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE MEG List No.: 3 Sl No.: 4