1 13 ca.4608.25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. 13 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4608 OF 2025 IN FAST/11899/2025 DINKAR UGARASEN PAWAR VERSUS RAJU SHIVRAM BHOSALE AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Prasanna Shankarrao Chavan. Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. Majit S. Shaikh. ... CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 17th November, 2025. P.C.: 1 Mr. Majit S. Shaikh, learned counsel submits that he has instructions to appear on behalf of respondent No.1. 2 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for respondent No.1. 3 This is an application for condonation of delay of 62 days caused in filing the first appeal. 4 The learned counsel for respondent No.1 strongly opposed the application and submitted that there is no sufficient reason to condone the delay. 5 On perusal of the application, it appears that the delay has not 2025:BHC-AUG:31659 2 13 ca.4608.25.odt been deliberately caused. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the delay deserves to be condoned. 6 For the reasons stated in the application, the delay stands condoned. The application stands allowed in the interest of justice. The appeal be registered. Appeal: 7 Issue notice to the respondents for final disposal, returnable on 15th December, 2025. Mr. Majit S. Shaikh, learned counsel waives notice on behalf of respondent No.1. 8 List the appeal for final disposal at admission stage on next date. 9 In addition to regular mode of service, private service, as is permissible in law, is permitted. 10 The record and proceedings be called for. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] nga