W.P No.22245 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 23.06.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C. KUMARAPPAN Writ Petition No.22245 of 2025 M.M.Kamaraj ... Petitioner ..Vs.. 1.The Commissioner, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, Panagal Maligai, Saidapet, Chennai-600 015. 2.The Inspector of Panchayats/The District Collector, Chengapattu Collectorate, Chengalpattu District. 3.The Assistant Director, Panchayat Raj, Chengalpattu, Chengalpattu District. 4.The Block Development Officer (V.P), Mdurantakam Panchayat Union, Chengalpattu District. 5.Gopala Kannan, The Block Development Officer (V.P), Maduranthakam Panchayat Union, Chengalpattu District. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P No.22245 of 2025 6.Paranthaman The Village Secretary (In-Charge), Vaiyavur Village Panchayat, Madurantakam Panchayat Union, Chengalpattu District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to direct the second respondent to pass an order based on in view of representation dated 22.04.2025 to take necessary Departmental action against the respondents four to six herein. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Naresh Kumar For Respondents : Mr.R.Sasikumar Government Advocate for RR1 to 4 ORDER The present writ petition has been filed with a prayer to direct the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd respondent to pass an order based on the representation dated 22.04.2025 to take necessary Departmental action against the respondents. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has given a complaint against the 4th and 6th respondents and such complaint is 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P No.22245 of 2025 yet to be considered by the respondents 1 and 2. 3. At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents would fairly submit that they would consider the petitioner’s representation accordance to its own merits and in accordance with law. 4. I have given my anxious consideration on either side submission. 5. In such view of the fair submission made by the learned Government Advocate, without going to the merits of the writ petition, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 22.04.2025 and pass order after giving due notice to the 5th and 6th respondents in accordance with its own merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P No.22245 of 2025 6. With the above observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 23.06.2024 ssi Index : Yes Speaking Order : Yes /No Neutral Citation Case: Yes/No To: 1.The Commissioner, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, Panagal Maligai, Saidapet, Chennai-600 015. 2.The Inspector of Panchayats/The District Collector, Chengapattu Collectorate, Chengalpattu District. 3.The Assistant Director, Panchayat Raj, Chengalpattu, Chengalpattu District. 4.The Block Development Officer (V.P), Mdurantakam Panchayat Union, Chengalpattu District. 5.Gopala Kannan, The Block Development Officer (V.P), 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P No.22245 of 2025 Maduranthakam Panchayat Union, Chengalpattu District. 6.Paranthaman The Village Secretary (In-Charge), Vaiyavur Village Panchayat, Madurantakam Panchayat Union, Chengalpattu District. C.KUMARAPPAN, J. ssi 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P No.22245 of 2025 W.P.No.22245 of 2025 23.06.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis