1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA & SMT. ARCHANA K M., MEMBER WP.NO.11535/2025 (BDA) (Lok Adalat No.7311/2025) BETWEEN: SRI SIDDARAJU S/O LATE SIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, EX-MEMBER OF KARNATAKA LEGISLATIVE COUNSIL, R/AT: NO.763, CHATURYA, 7TH CROSS, RAMANUJA ROAD, FORT MOHALLA, MYSURU-570 004. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUNDARESH H C., ADVOCATE) AND 1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA RPT BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU- 560 001. 2 2 . THE COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PART WEST, BENGALURU- 560 020. 3 . THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-I, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PART WEST, BENGALURU- 560 020. …..RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. GOWTHAM DEV C ULLAL.,ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3; AGA FOR R1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 19/09/2018 AND 04/03/2025 AS PER ANNX-C AND E RESPECTIVELY FOR ALLOTMENT OF G CATEGORY SITE IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER, PURSUANT TO THE LETTER ADDRESSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEARING NO. SAAE/279/BENBUSWA/2009 DATED 22/08/2009 AS PER ANNX-A AND REFER THE MATTER TO JUSTICE A.S. BELLUNKE ENQUIRY COMMITTEE APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNMENT FOR SCRUTINY OF G CATEGORY SITES. AS PER THE DIRECTION ISSUED BY THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA IN WP NO.23475/10 AND CONNECTED MATTER DTD.25/8/12. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. 3 CONCILIATION ORDER The petitioner and respondent No.2 are present. 2. Memo is filed, which reads as under: “The petitioner in the above W.P has filed directing representation to respondent No.2 BDA dated 19.09.2018 and 04.03.2025 as per Annexures-C and E. As per Lok-Adalath both party has agreed to consider representation in accordance with law within 6 weeks - in the interest of justice and equity.” 3. The writ petition stands disposed of in terms of the joint memo. Sd/- JUSTICE Sd/- MEMBER PHM