Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 67013 (KAR)

MR M K MARIGOWDA v. CHAIRMAN

WP/19815/2018 · 2025-07-30

D K Singh, Venkatesh Naik T

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29459-DB WP No. 19815 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T WRIT PETITION NO. 19815 OF 2018 (GM-KLA) BETWEEN: MR. M.K. MARIGOWDA S/O LATE KALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, NO.48/10, 6TH CROSS, BENDRE NAGAR, BSK 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE-70. …PETITIONER (BY SRI P.N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. CHAIRMAN, GOVERNING COUNCIL, KIDWAI MEMORIAL INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY, BANGALORE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001. 2. BOARD OF APPOINTMENT, KIDWAI MEMORIAL INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY DR. M H MARIGOWDA ROAD, BANGALORE-29 REPRESENTED BY ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29459-DB WP No. 19815 of 2018 FAMILY WELFARE (MEDICAL EDUCATION) GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001. 3. THE DIRECTOR KIDWAI MEMORIAL INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY DR. M H MARIGOWDA ROAD, BANGALORE-29 4. UPALOKAYUKTHA-1, KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTHA, M S BUILDING, DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-01, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR. 5. ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR ENQUIRIES-1, KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTHA, M S BUILDING, DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-01. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI ARAVIND V. CHAVAN, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 TO R-3; SRI VENKATESH S. ARABATTI, ADV. FOR R-4 AND R-5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ENQUIRY REPORT DATED 21.11.2015 SUBMITTED BY 5TH RESPONDENT AS PER ANNEXURE-A RECOMMENDATION DATED 22.12.2015 FORWARDED BY 4TH RESPONDENT AS PER ANNEXURE-B, PROCEEDINGS DATED 10.04.2018 CONDUCTED BY 2ND RESPONDENT AS PER ANNEXURE-C AND THE ORDER OF DISMISSAL DATED 10.04.2018 PASSED BY 3RD RESPONDENT AS PER ANNEXURE-D AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3 TO RE-INSTATE THE PETITIONER TO HIS ORIGINAL POST WITH ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29459-DB WP No. 19815 of 2018 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) Neither in the first round nor in the revised call, the counsel for the petitioner has put in appearance to make submissions in support of the writ petition and therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE BKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 72