Machinery Marketing Associates Pvt. Ltd. v. The State of Bihar
CWJC/17052/2025 · 2026-06-25
Ranjan Kumar Jha, Sudhir Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6699 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6699 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17052 of 2025 ======================================================
1. Machinery Marketing Associates Pvt. Ltd. having its registered office at 2E/24, Jhandewalan Extension, Police Station- Paharganj, District- Central Delhi, New Delhi, PIN- 110055 through its director.
2. Mukul Malik, S/o Shyam Sunder Malik, Resident of 58/9 F/F, Kishangarh, Near Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, P.S.- Vasant Kunj, District- South West Delhi, Delhi- 110070. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Bihar State Disaster Management Authority, Patna.
2. The Secretary, Bihar State Disaster Management Authority, Patna.
3. Vice Chairman, Bihar State Disaster Management Authority, Patna.
4. Special Secretary, Bihar State Disaster Management Authority, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Government Advocate 05 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH) 2 25-06-2026
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that during pendency of the present writ application, the financial bid has already been opened, and thereafter, work
order has also been issued in favour of one M/s M.K. Traders.
2. A copy of the aforesaid work order, produced by
learned counsel for the State, is taken on record and marked as 'X'.
3. In view of the aforesaid, this Court is of the view
Patna High Court CWJC No.17052 of 2025(2) dt.25-06-2026 2/2 that the grievance raised in the present writ application no longer survives for adjudication rendering the present application infructuous.
4. Accordingly, the present writ application stands
disposed of as having become infructuous.
5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
Anushka/- (Sudhir Singh, J) (Ranjan Kumar Jha, J) U