165 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-5855-2025 DECIDED ON: 29.05.2025 HARI OM JOSHI AND ANOTHER .....PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Kashav Chadha, Advocate for Mr. Ruhani Chadha, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. J.S.Rattu, DAG, Punjab. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus directing respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent No.4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he will be satisfied in case a direction be issued to respondent No.3 to look into the representation dated 27.05.2025 (Annexure P-3), within a time bound manner. In view of the above, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3/ Commissioner of Police, Amritsar to look into the representation dated 27.05.2025 (Annexure P-3) and decide the same in accordance with law after providing an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioners within a period of four weeks by passing a speaking order. The CDR, which is attached to the present petition shall also be considered during the course of considering the above-said complaint. A copy of order so passed be supplied to the petitioners within three days thereafter. 29.05.2025 (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) sonia JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No SONIA BURA 2025.05.29 20:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document