Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6696 (JHR)

MURAT YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1470/2025 · 2025-07-03

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:17762 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1470 of 2025 ------ 1.Murat Yadav, son of late Mrigu Yadav 2.Mahrang Yadav, son of late Guni Yadav 3.Devan Yadav, son of late Guni Yadav 4.Panan Bhuiyan, son of late Budhu Bhuiyan 5.Jogan Bhuiyan, son of late Mushan Bhuiyan 6.Luxman RAM @ Laxman Bhuiyan, son of late Faguni Bhuiyan All residents of village Byang, PO Matlong, PS Manika, District Latehar … … Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nandan Prasad, Advocate. For the State : Mr. P. K. Chatterjee, A.P.P. ----- 03/ 03.07.2025 Heard the parties. 2. This anticipatory bail application under Sections 482 and 484 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioners apprehending their arrest for offences registered under Sections 33/29 of the Indian Forest Act. 3. It is alleged that in the land which is located in the forest, the petitioners are cultivating food grains. 4. Learned A.P.P. representing the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 5. Since there is no allegation that the petitioners have chopped any trees or fell any trees, this Court finds it a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application stands allowed. The petitioners, above named, are directed to surrender before the learned court below within four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and on the event of their surrender or arrest, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the 2025:JHHC:17762 2 satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Latehar, in connection with Complaint (C.F.) Case No.382 of 2017, subject to the condition that one of the bailers should be a close relative of the petitioners and other should be a resident of State of Jharkhand, having sufficient landed property in his/her name or in the name of his/her ancestors in which he/she is having share and to that effect, he/she has to file an affidavit before the Trial Court indicating his/her share in the property. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Tanuj/Cp-3