KAILASH CHAND AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/31085/2025 · 2025-09-10
Manisha Batra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66940 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66940 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 301 CRM-M-31085-2025 Date of Decision: 10.09.2025 Kailash Chand and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA **** Present: Mr. Mukesh Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, A.A.G., Haryana. Mr. Aman Arora, Advocate for Mr. Deepak Goyal, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3.
MANISHA BATRA
, J. (ORAL)
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing of FIR No.68 dated 20.04.2024 registered under Sections 323, 506 and 34 of IPC (Section 308 of IPC added later on), at Police Station Sadar Rewari, District Rewari and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 19.05.2025 (Annexure P-2).
2. This Court vide order dated 01.08.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise.
3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Rewari and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has HARISH KUMAR 2025.09.11 19:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
CRM-M-31085-2025 -2- submitted report dated 04.09.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence.
4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties.
5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR.
6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.68 dated 20.04.2024 registered under Sections 323, 506 and 34 of IPC (Section 308 of IPC added later on), at Police Station Sadar Rewari, District Rewari and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 19.05.2025 (Annexure P-2) are quashed qua the petitioners.
(MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE September 10, 2025 Nisha-1 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No HARISH KUMAR 2025.09.11 19:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment