IN TH 222 Gurnam S Dalbir Kau CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU concurrent whereby possession shows that 29.10.2025 27.3.2025 w parties, the parties abo adjournmen for both the RSA-1934-2014 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Regular Second Appeal No.19 Date of decision :-08.04.202 nam Singh Versus ir Kaur and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI None for the appellant. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The defendant/appellant is in urrent judgments and decrees of t eby the suit filed by the plaint ession has been decreed by both the Co The matter pertains to the s that from the last two consecutive 0.2025 there is no representation on .2025 when there was no representatio es, the Registry was directed to infor es about the date fixed and it was als rnment shall be granted. As per office report dated 28 oth the parties have been informed and 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH No.1934 of 2014 (O & M) .2026 …..Appellant …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA t is in second appeal against the of the learned Courts below plaintiffs/respondents for joint the Courts below. the year 2014. Order sheets cutive dates i.e. 27.3.2025 and on on behalf of appellant. On entation on behalf of any of the inform learned counsel for the as also directed that no further ted 28.10.2025, learned counsel ed and served. VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.10 17.51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document any of the p date, notic respondent effect serv concerned matter. this Court, Parties Sole appell Responden Responden Responden 13(a,b,c) Responden Responden the parties, parties. appellant h present litig of the Cou appellant in has adopte RSA-1934-2014 (O & M) Despite that there was no re f the parties on the last date of hearin notice of actual date was issued to ndents for today and the Registry was t service upon both the parties th erned area so that effective steps can In compliance of the order da ourt, the following office report has b Repor appellant Not r address ondents No.1 to 7 Refuse Hence ondent No.8 Served ondents No.9, 10 and Not r address ondent No.11 Died ondent No.12 Served In absence of any representat arties, further proceedings cannot be c Even today none appears on A bare reading of the abo llant has exhibited an utterly casual a nt litigation. It is to be appreciated tha e Court has been expended in affo llant in the interest of justice. On th dopted an utterly casual and careless 2 no representation on behalf of hearing i.e. 29.10.2025. On that ued to the appellant as well as ry was directed to make effort to ties through the SHO of the s can be taken to dispose of the der dated 29.10.2025 passed by t has been received :- eports ot residing on the given ddress efused to receive summons. ence affixation made. erved through Husband ot residing on the given ddress erved sentation on behalf of either of ot be carried out. ars on behalf of either of the e above facts shows that the sual attitude in the pursuit of the ted that very valuable public time n affording opportunities to the On the other hand, the appellant areless approach. It is clear that VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.10 17.51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document neither the pursuing th option exce April 08, 2 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo RSA-1934-2014 (O & M) er the appellant nor his counsel a ing the present matter. Thus, this C n except to dismiss the same for non Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, , 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 3 nsel are seriously interested in this Court is left with no other r non-prosecution. if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.10 17.51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document