Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:123845 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19668 of 2025 Petitioner :- Puneet Jain Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kumar Anish Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
1. This writ petiton has been filed with the following prayers;
"I. Issue a writ of certiorari to quashing the report of Kanoongo dt. 26.05.2025, Tehsil Anoop Sahar District Buland Sahar which has send to Tehsildar Anoop Sahar, fourth with. II. Issue a writ order direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent Kanoongo to prepared a fresh report within stipulated time period as Hon'ble Court think Deem Fit. III. Issue a writ order direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.-2 to conclude the proceeding of case no 03701/2025, computer case no-T202511170303701 Puneet Jain Vs. within in stipulated time period as Hon'ble Court think Deem fit otherwise petitioner shall suffer irreparable loss and injury. IV. Issue a writ of mandamus directing to the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondent authority to not interfere in the peace full possession of the petitioner. V. Any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case. VI. Award the cost of the writ petition to the Petitioner."
2. After a preliminary objection has been raised as to the maintainability of writ petition and pointing out the order passed by this Court, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the proceeding under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has already been concluded.
3. The third prayer made in the writ petition is for concluding the proceeding of Case No. 3701 of 2025. Learned counsel for petitioner further submits that an appeal against the order passed under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has been preferred which is pending consideration.
4. This Court finds that petitioner's counsel is in habit of making false statement before the Court and when the truth was
unfolded by learned Standing Counsel he conceded the said fact and submits that appeal is pending consideration.
5. Writ petition is misconceived and same stands dismissed with cost of Rs. 10000/-. Order Date :- 28.7.2025 Shekhar Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad