Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:71821 Court No. - 86 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 21093 of 2024 Applicant :- Kaushlesh Kumar Maurya Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dhirendra Singh Patel,Vivek Kumar Maheshwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material brought on record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that as per the F.I.R. allegation the applicant and other co-accused named in the F.I.R., who happened to be the Director in the company are stated to have duped several persons to the tune of Rs. 24,02,620/- as several persons had invested heavy amount with the company. Learned counsel further submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. The applicant was simply a Director in the said company, but the management of the company has been conducted by the Managing Director of the company. One cvo-accused, Khemraj Gupta, has already been granted anticipatory bail till the conclusion of trial. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. He next submits that the applicant is in jail since 29.11.2023, with no criminal history. 3. Learned A.G.A. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail but he has not disputed the above submissions made on behalf of applicant. 4. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence and without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed. 5. Let the applicant-Kaushlesh Kumar Maurya, be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 0664 of 2022, under Sections 406, 419, 420 I.P.C., Police Station- Kotwali, District- Fatehpur, on executing a personal bond and furnishing two local sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence. ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses. iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court. iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission. v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 6. In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, the court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of applicant in accordance with law. Order Date :- 2.5.2025 Mustaqeem. Digitally signed by :- MOHD MUSTAQEEM KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad