Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6690 (UTT)

BHAWAN SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/471/2025 · 2025-05-21

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.471 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Siddhartha Bankoti, Advocate for the petitioners. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. Learned State counsel, on instructions, which are taken on record, submits that after investigation charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioners on 29.03.2025, which is not disputed by counsel for the petitioners. 4. In view of the statement made by State counsel, counsel for the petitioners submits that he would challenge the charge sheet in appropriate proceedings before this Court. 5. Accordingly writ petition is dismissed as infructuous; however it is open to the petitioners to challenge the charge sheet, in accordance with law. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 21.05.2025 SK