HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CCP (S) No. 244/2025 Nirmal Vaid .....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through :- Mr. Rishav Vaid, Advocate v/s Kumar Rajeev Ranjan & Ors. .....Respondent(s) Through :- Ms. Chetna Manhas, Assisting counsel to Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE ORDER 20.04.2026 1. By this petition, petitioner has alleged non-compliance/willful disobedience of order dated 12.03.2025 passed by this Court in case titled “Nirmal Vs. UT of J & K & Ors.” bearing WP (C) No. 248/2024, whereby the writ petition (supra) has been disposed of with the following directions: “In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of by directing the Deputy Commissioner, Jammu/Respondent No. 2 herein to decide the application filed by the petitioner for providing Fard Intikhab Jambandi, taking into consideration the report dated 03.05.2024 submitted by the Tehsildar, Bahu, Jammu. The entire exercise shall be completed by the respondents within a period of thirty days from the date a copy of this order is made available with respondent No. 2.” 2. Compliance report stands filed by the respondents, wherein it is stated that the claim of the petitioner for providing Fard Intikhab Jamabandi has been examined by the respondents, however, since the kind of soil of the land in question is recorded as Gair Mumkin Sr. No. 192 2 CCP (S) No. 244/2025 Khad, as such, Fard for such lands cannot be issued at this point of time. 3. Ms. Chetna Manhas, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents states that the claim of the petitioner has been considered and rejected, which stands conveyed to him vide order dated 09.02.2026. 4. In view of the above, proceedings in the instant contempt petition are closed and rule, if any, framed against the respondents, be discharged. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach this Court, if the cause survives, otherwise. (Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge JAMMU 20.04.2026 Manan