101 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2891-2025 Date of decision: 31.07.2025 KESHAV RAI DHANDA ..Petitioner Versus TARSEM SINGH BHINDER & ANR. ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. S.S. Salar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Kavita Arora, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Animesh Sharma, Addl. A.G, Punjab. SUDEEPTI SHARMA , J. (Oral) 1. The present contempt petition has been filed for non-compliance of order dated 01.10.2024 passed by this Court in CWP-17031-1997. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 contends that as per the compliance report dated 30.06.2025, filed by Sh. Tarsem Singh Bhinder, Chairman, Improvement Trust, Ludhiana, order dated 01.10.2024 has been complied with by passing a speaking order dated 28.01.2025 (Annexure R-1/1). This fact is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. The relevant para 3 and 4 of the compliance report dated 30.06.2025, are reproduced as under:- “3. That in compliance of the order dated 01.10.2024, as well as order dated 28.05.2024, the petitioner was called for personal hearing on 22.01.2025 to appear before the respondent No. 2 on 28.01.2025. The said letter dated 22.01.2025 was sent through regd. post to the petitioner. MOHD AYUB 2025.07.31 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-2891-2025 -2- The Petitioner thereafter appeared before the office of respondent No. 2 and produce various documents along with record available with him. 4. That thereafter the claim of the petitioner Keshav Rai Dhanda was considered by the Committee and the same was rejected by passing a detailed speaking order dated 28.01.2025. A copy of the Speaking order dated 28.01.2025 is attached as ANNEXURE R-1 with the present Affidavit.” 4. In view of the above, the present contempt is purged and rule is discharged. July 31st, 2025 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) Ayub JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MOHD AYUB 2025.07.31 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.