233 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-24924-2016(O&M) Date of Decision:24.09.2025 SANTOSH RANI .....Petitioner VERSUS PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT AND ORS. .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. J.S.Maanipur, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for the respondents. KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner informs this Court that he has no instructions from the petitioner in the instant matter, inasmuch as, correct address of respondent no.3, has also not been supplied, despite repeated requests. 2. In view of the above, it seems that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the instant petition, therefore, this Court is left with no other option, except to dismiss the instant petition for want of non- prosecution. 3. Ordered accordingly. 4. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner, to revive the instant petition by filing an apt motion, in case her grievance still survives. (KULDEEP TIWARI) September 24, 2025 JUDGE dharamvir Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No DHARAM VIR 2025.09.26 12:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document