IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No: 2268 of 2025 Decided on: 10.02.2025 M/s Zeon Biosys ...Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ...Respondents Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN SHARMA, VACATION JUDGE WHETHER APPROVED FOR REPORTING? No. For the petitioner : Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India with Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 and 3. Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate General for respondent No.2. Ranjan Sharma, Judge At the very outset, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that the case of the petitioner is covered by the judgement passed in CWP No.10600 of 2024, titled as Atul Sharma versus Union of India and others, decided on 06.01.2025 [Annexure P-10] and other connected matters. 2. Per contra, Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India, states that the claim of petitioner shall be 2 examined in the light of the judgement passed in case of Atul Sharma (supra) and if, on facts and law, the claim of petitioner is covered in terms of aforesaid judgement, further consequential action, upon consideration, shall be taken in accordance with law. 3. Without going into merits and leaving all questions open, this Court directs the Respondents No. 1 and 3 to examine the claim of the petitioner in the light of the judgement in Atul Sharma’s case (supra), and upon consideration, in case the claim of the petitioner is found to be identical to the judgement in Atul Sharma’s case then, further consequential action be taken after affording a personal hearing to the petitioner, within a period of two months from today. In aforesaid terms, the instant writ petition as well as the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. No order as to costs. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge February 10, 2025 (tm)