Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6687 (GAU)

SHRI DAMODAR PRASAD BAJAJ v. SHRI SWARUP JYOTI CHOUDHURY

I.A.(Civil)/390/2025 · 2025-03-20

Arun Dev Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010019392025 2025:GAU-AS:3139 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/390/2025 in WP(C) 6876/2024 SHRI DAMODAR PRASAD BAJAJ S/O LT JHABARMAL BAJAJ, R/O 1ST FLOOR, BAJAJ SADAM, BYLANE NO - 2, A K AZAD ROAD, REHABARI, GUWAHATI - 781001 VERSUS SHRI SWARUP JYOTI CHOUDHURY S/O LT PRADIP KUMAR CHOUDHURY, R/O R K CHOUDHURY PATH, PS BHARALUMUKH, SUB DIVISION GUWAHATI, DISTRICT - KAMRUP (M), PIN CODE 781009 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR MRIGANKA KASHYAP, MR. R K BHUYAN,MR. S A SINGH,MR. A BHATTACHARJEE,MR. M KASHYAP Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPT, BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER 21-03-2025 1. Heard Mr. R. K. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the applicant. Page No.# 2/2 2. The present interlocutory application is filed by the applicant to get himself impleaded as party respondent No. 5 in the connected WP(C) No. 6876/2024. 3. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that she has no instruction to object this interlocutory application. 4. Perused the pleadings and also considering the litigational history between the parties, this Court is of the opinion that the present applicant shall be a necessary party for proper determination of the connected writ petition. 5. Accordingly, the present interlocutory application stands allowed impleading the applicant as party respondent No. 5 in the connected WP(C) No. 6876/2024. 6. The learned counsel for the respondent No. 5 shall furnish an amended cause title before the Registry. Thereafter, Registry shall do the needful. JUDGE Comparing Assistant