Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 66867 (CAL)

SRIPARNA MAJUMDAR v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

WP.CT/61/2023 · 2025-07-28

Partha Sarathi Sen, Sujoy Paul

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ct.No.1 D/L 16.04.2026 54-57 Saikat Mukherjee WP.CT/60/2023 SATYAJIT ROY VS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. WITH WP.CT/61/2023 SRIPARNA MAJUMDAR VS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. WITH WP.CT/62/2023 KUNTAL DATTA VS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. WITH WP.CT/63/2023 AMIT KUMAR GHOSH VS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Mr. Dibyendu Chatterjee, Adv. Ms. Reshmi Ghosh, Adv. Ms. Parna Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Mainak Singha …For the Petitioners Mr. Ravi Ranjan Kumar, Adv. …For the Respondents Dictated by Partha Sarathi Sen, J. 1. Parties are represented through their respective learned advocates. 2. On behalf of the respondents an accommodation has been prayed for on the ground that learned senior advocate Shri Nilanjan Bhattacharjee is not in a position to argue this matter today on behalf of Union of India. 3. Prayer for accommodation is considered as a last chance. 4. Let this matter be listed two weeks hence under the same heading. 5. Liberty to mention. (SUJOY PAUL, CJ.) (PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J.)