Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 66867 (ALL)

SAURABH CHANDRA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/8672/2025 · 2025-07-02

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:103797 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8672 of 2025 Petitioner :- Saurabh Chandra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Birendra Singh,Swati Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Birendra Singh,C.S.C.,Sant Ram Sharma Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents particularly Principal Zila Parishad Krishi Mahavidyalaya Banda to forthwith release/pay the salary of the petitioner w.e.f. September, 2024 onwards till date. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents particularly Principal Zila Parishad Krishi Mahavidyalaya Banda not to restrain the petitioner to conduct his duties on the post of clerk in Zila Parishad Krishi Mahavidyalaya Banda." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made innocuous prayer that his representation dated 11.03.2025, which is pending before respondent no.2, may be directed to be decided in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State- respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard Sri Birendra Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State as well as Sri Sant Ram Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a fresh detailed representation along with the present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 within 10 days from today. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.2 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 3.7.2025 Pratima (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad