VIKAS SHARMA, S/O VASUDEV SHARMA v. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
CW/3555/2025 · 2025-05-27
Anil Kumar Upman
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6686 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6686 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:22270] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3555/2025 Vikas Sharma, S/o Vasudev Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 644, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur. At Present 124, Mangal Vihar, Gopalpura Bypass, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus
1. Jaipur Development Authority, Through Secretary, Indira Circle, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Ujjwal Rathore, Secretary, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur
3. Raghuvir Saini, Chief Enforcement Officer, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur
4. Rebadmal, Enforcement Officer Zone-5, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur
5. Amit Godha, S/o Sh. Anil Kumar Godha, R/o 125, Mangal Vihar, Gopalpura Bypass, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Dr. Rudranshu Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kuri with Mr. Dharma Ram, Mr. Harshvardhan Shekhawat & Ms. Nandini Mirdha, for JDA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 27/05/2025 Instant writ petition has been filed with following relief:-
“It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to call for the entire record relating to this case and after pursuing the same, may be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition, and - (a) By appropriate writ, order, or direction, direct the JDA Tribunal, Jaipur to decide the contempt petition No.65/2022 titled as Vikas
[2025:RJ-JP:22270] (2 of 2) [CW-3555/2025] Sharma vs. JDA and Ors. within a period of three months from the order of the High Court and any other direction which this Hon’ble Court found fit and proper. (b) Award costs of the writ petition to the petitioner.”
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that contempt petition filed by petitioner is pending before JDA Appellate Tribunal since 2022 but same has not been decided. It is submitted that in these circumstances, JDA Appellate Tribunal may be directed to expedite the proceedings.
Learned counsel appearing for JDA does not dispute the factual aspect of the case and submits that necessary directions may be issued to the JDA Appellate Tribunal. Considering the fact that contempt petition filed by the petitioner is pending since 2022, I deem it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition with the direction to JDA Appellate Tribunal to expedite the proceedings in the contempt petition filed by the petitioner. It is further directed to make all endeavors to conclude the proceedings within a period of four months. With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition is disposed of.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /52