Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:106856 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 20065 of 2025 Applicant :- Rajkumar Verma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Yadvesh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. 1. Heard Sri Yadvesh Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Padmakar Rai, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.233 of 2024, under Sections-419, 420, 406, 467, 468, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station-Sigra, District-Varanasi, during the pendency of the trial. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that as per the FIR, allegation is that the Director of the Company- Awsom Intraproject Limited persuaded several investors to invest money with the promise of heavy returns. Subsequently, returns was not paid to the investors, including the first informant. Thereafter, the FIR in question was lodged. It is further submitted that from bare perusal of the FIR, it is clear that the applicant is neither the Director nor an Officer of the Company-Awsom Intraproject Limited. Applicant is a Computer Operator in the aforesaid company and he was not aware about the intention of its Director namely, Ravindra Kumar Sharma and Krishna Kumar Sharma. It is further submitted that the applicant has explained the criminal history. It is further submitted that charge-sheet has been filed in the present case, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. The applicant is a law-abiding citizen and he is languishing in jail since 04.01.2022. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicant- Rajkumar Verma involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. v. The applicant will not leave the country without permission of the court concerned. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Order Date :- 8.7.2025 S.Chaurasia Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad