IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2712 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14189 of 2017 ====================================================== Ravi Bhushan Prasad Verma S/o Late Achyutanand Prasad Verma, R/o Village Panditpur, PO/PS Rajgir, Dist. Nalanda at present Amrudi Lane Arya Kumar Road, Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Urban Development and Housing Department Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Collector, Nalanda, Biharsharif. 3. The Executive Officer Rajgir Nalanda Nagar Panchayat Rajgir Nalanda. 4. The Circle Officer, Rajgir, Nalanda. 5. Janardan Prasad Verma S/o Late Guruadhin Prasad Verma, R/o Village Panditpur, Rajgir (Nalanda) at present Kattrapar, P.S. Laheri, P.O. Bihar Sharif. 6. Shailendra Dutt Verma, S/o Late Guruadhin Prasad Verma, R/o Village Panditpur, Rajgir (Nalanda) at present Kattrapar, P.S. Laheri, P.O. Bihar Sharif. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ravi Bhushan Prasad Verma, In-person For the Opposite Party/s : AC to SC-6. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 18-04-2025 1. Heard petitioner (in-person) and learned AC to SC- 6. 2. The petitioner (in person) appears and submits that the instant restoration application has been filed seeking restoration of CWJC No. 14189 of 2017 to its original file, which stood dismissed for default by an order dated 18-3-2023. 3. The petitioner (in person) next submits that CWJC No. 14189 of 2017 was filed for quashing Advertisement No. 02 Patna High Court MJC No.2712 of 2024(3) dt.18-04-2025 2/2 of 2017-18 published in a local Hindi daily on 10-9-2017, whereby the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat Rajgir, invited bids for constructing PCC Road from PWD Road from the house of Bindheshwari Prasad to Mahadevsthan at village Panditpur-Rajgir, which is private land of late Achyutanand Prasad Verma, father of the petitioner, and the land has fallen in share of the petitioner. 4. It is further submitted by the petitioner that the said Advertisement No. 2 of 2017-18 was subsequently cancelled, as such no useful purpose would be served by restoring the CWJC No. 14189 of 2017 to its original file. It is also submitted that petitioner be given liberty to assail any other advertisement, if issued for the same purpose, on which the learned State counsel submits that the said liberty is always there. 5. After hearing the petitioner (in person) that no useful purpose would be served by restoring the CWJC No. 14189 of 2017 to its original file, as such the restoration application is dismissed. SUMIT/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U