[2025:RJ-JP:14133] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.2114/2025 Dhanraj Alias Dhannaram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Badbadh, Police Station Kamkhera, District- Jhalawar (Raj.) (Presently Confined In Central Jail At Kota.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 27/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.153/2023, registered at Police Station Mandana, District Kota, for the offence(s) under Sections 8/15 of the N.D.P.S. Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated for the offences under Sections 8/15 and 8/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act. It is contended that the accused-petitioner was arrested on 06.01.2024 and the accused-petitioner was not aware about the fact that the accused- petitioner has been declared absconded and charge-sheet has been produced against him under Section 299 of Cr.P.C. It is also contended that there is no conceivable evidence available on record against the accused-petitioner that the accused-petitioner [2025:RJ-JP:14133] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2114/2025] has supplied the contraband article to the main accused Mukesh. There is no connectivity between the present petitioner and the accused Mukesh, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail application. It is contended that the accused-petitioner remained absent from the investigation and warrant against him under Section 37 of the Police Act was obtained, thereafter, the accused-petitioner was chargesheeted under Section 299 of the Cr.P.C. The investigation would reveal that the accused-petitioner supplied the said contraband article to the main accused Mukesh, therefore, considering the conduct of the accused-petitioner and allegation levelled against him, the bail application of the accused- petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. Apart from the disclosure statement of the other co-accused, there are no other substantive evidence available on record which shows that the accused-petitioner has supplied the contraband article to the main accused Mukesh. Though the accused- petitioner was declared absconded but considering the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 06.01.2025 and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, without expressing anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- [2025:RJ-JP:14133] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2114/2025] Dhanraj Alias Dhannaram, in connection with FIR No.153/2023, registered at Police Station Mandana, District Kota, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-14