Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 66796 (KAR)

SRI WASIM ALIL S/O. MAKBULSHA MAKANDAR v. SMT WAHIDA W/O. WASIM ALI MAKANDAR

RPFC/100084/2025 · 2025-11-20

C M Joshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15980 RPFC No. 100084 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 100084 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI. WASIM ALI S/O. MAKBULSHA MAKANDAR, AGE: 34, OCC. NIL, R/O. TIPPU NAGAR, BADAMI, TQ. BADAMI, DIST. BAGALKOTE-587201. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.V. SOMAPUR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. WAHIDA W/O. WASIM ALI MAKANDAR, AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK. R/O. TIPPU NAGAR, BADAMI, TQ. BADAMI, DIST. BAGALKOTE-587201, NOW AT VALLABA BAI CHOWK, UPPAR MOHALLA, BAGALKOTE, DIST. BAGALKOTE-587101. 2. KUMARI NOORAIN D/O. WASIM ALI MAKANDAR, AGE: 04, OCC. NIL, SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY HER NATURAL MOTHER AND MINOR GUARDIAN RESPONDENT NO.1. SMT. WAHIDA W. MAKANDAR , R/O. TIPPU NAGAR, BADAMI, TQ. BADAMI,DIST. BAGALKOTE, NOW AT VALLABA BAI CHOWK, UPPAR MOHALLA, BAGALKOTE, DIST. BAGALKOTE-587101. …RESPONDENTS THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT., PRAYING TO, THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL JUDGE FAMILY COURT BAGALKOTE IN CRL.MISC.NO.94/2021 DATED 19.03.2025 MY PLEASE BE SET ASIDE BY ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Digitally signed by YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Date: 2025.11.22 10:15:37 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15980 RPFC No. 100084 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI) Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition, which reads as under: “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL Herein, the advocate for the petitioner respectfully submits as under: That, in view of compromise arrived at between the petitioner and respondent, the petitioner intends to withdraw this petition. Hence, it is humble submission before this Hon’ble Court be kindly dismiss the petition as withdrawn. Hence this memo.” In view of the memo, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. In view of disposal of the petition, pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and are disposed of. SD/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE YAN CT:PA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 18