RAHUL AILAS RAKESH SINGH (MINOR) v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY HOME DEHRADUN U.K.
C482/859/2023 · 2025-05-01
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6679 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6679 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
C482 No.859 of 2023 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Himanshu Aswal, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Navnish Negi, Advocate for the applicant.
2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. for the State.
3. There is no representation for respondent nos.2 and 3.
4. According to learned counsel for the applicant, the present C482 application has rendered infructuous as the applicant has been acquitted during trial.
5. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the applicant, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
01.05.2025 SK